• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 25th, 2023

help-circle

  • Thanks, you are spot on: Playing Street Fighter 6 casually and even bought a SteamDeck to have a computer with enough power to run it. :-) For me it is the 3rd, after 3rd Strike (ha ;-)) which hooked me, although I have to confess Fightcarde and 3rd Strike are still peak Street Fighter for me. Street Fighter IV never ‘clicked’ for me, and I didn’t like the presentation of Street Fighter V at all.

    Hope we run into each other in an online match, though I hail from Europe so we might not be in the same region.


  • Yeah, for DS1, I totally respect the artistic vision and that they simply created a game against the trends (back then) … at the same time I made it trough the swamp under the Orc-City w/o the ring which allows immunity to the swamp poison. When I looked up how to get this ring (back to the Asylum) I was just like: WTF, I have a real life, how should I have figured this out by myself? … this turned me away, although I still have a lot of respect and love for DS1!


  • wolf@lemmy.ziptoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago
    • Street Fighter II in basically any edition. Was my entry point in fighting games and to this day it just feels ‘right’
    • Street Fighter III, 3rd Strike (It is that good and to this day one of the highlights)
    • Slay the Spire
    • Contra (NES)
    • Super Mario Brothers (NES) (What an utterly brilliant game)
    • Castlevania 3 (NES)
    • Vampyre Survivors (Ok, maybe just pure dopamine addiction)
    • Sudoku
    • Final Fantasy 1 Pixel Remaster
    • XCOM
    • Open X-COM
    • Olli Olli
    • rogue
    • Tetris
    • Into the breach … and Quake




  • Scrolled too far down to find one of my favorite comfort games… bought it multiple times so I can play it on every device I own. Works perfectly on everything from my smartphone over my netbook, laptop to my SteamDeck. Just brilliant game design and I am looking forward to part 2! :-)








    • Teaching math is mostly done w/o context and history, IMHO a lot of math makes much more sense when the original problem is understood, before the level of abstraction is being raised.
    • Math is a also a language and a notation. Unless one uses math regularly, there is simply not enough practice/repetition to read/speak this notation.
    • Math is a tower of abstractions, depending on other abstractions. A lot of topics in math depends on people understanding a lot of basic parts, which means if a student just got by with a prior topic, it is near impossible to catch up/understand what is currently being taught. (Compare to other topics: For example, if a student is bad in their Greek history, they get a fresh start when the topic is industrialization in England w/o any penalty.)
    • Math in the primary and secondary schools is mostly computation, ‘real math’ is only taught to people studying MINT.

    tl;dr

    • we need a better curriculum in the primary/secondary schools
    • we need more exercises in reading/writing the mathematical notation (sorry, just understanding math is not enough, because understanding doesn’t make one fluent)
    • at least in my school years, math was not repeated enough.
    • reading/understanding math is really hard, at the higher levels, understanding 2-3 pages on a textbook per day is an acceptable pace. I guess all the entertainment nowadays makes it not easier to sit still in a room and get math into ones brain

    For me the ‘breakthrough’ with math was, simply to accept that at the higher levels we are speaking about symbols (abstractions) that follow certain rules and everything else is derived by pure logic. Just accepting that one is manipulating symbols with rules to get to other symbols and learning the rules, made it click for me. Disclaimer: Was lucky with great math teachers in university, but even in my university there were people who simply could not accept the game of mathematics and were frustrated, because they wanted easy question/answer style formulas in the sense: When you see this, substitute PI with 3.14 and multiply r by r and write down the number that your calculator shows. They never made any effort to understand where PI comes from, where the radius comes from and why it makes sense.

    What is insane, is how many people studied computer science but are totally unable to apply mathematics to the problems they try to solve. Supposedly most of them learned relational algebra and discrete mathematics during their studies (and formal languages/complexity theory)… it is like something is missing in their ability to transfer what they learned in the university to basically the same problems where the symbols have different names. That is something I would love to understand.