• Genius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Boomers 1945-1960
    Gen X 1960-1980
    Millennials 1980-2000
    Zoomers 2000-2020
    Gen alpha 2020-2040

    If we’re going to have a made up system with no rules, it might as well be well ordered.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Convenient as that potentially would be, that does not seem to be the popular understanding, and I see no reason not to use to the conventional understanding in a case where stubbornness is unlikely to shift said understanding.

      Hopefully unnecessarily preemptive “if you don’t like Wikipedia” invitation to websearch using the engine of your choice and observe the general response without hunting for a cherry-pickable example which defines them as such.

      edit: i noticed you were downvoted and feel compelled to mention that I did not downvote you; it’s weird to downvote people for normal conversation.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        15 year generations don’t really make sense though, the whole concept of a generation is that they’re the previous generation’s kids.

        • Vespair@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t disagree, but unfortunately nobody granted me authority on the general consensus on this one. I will say though that lineagial generations feel like only one possible definition, and cultural generations defined by common cultural experience (as is the case we’re discussing) feel like they have some validity for me as well.