Wired is more efficient, you can pick it up and use it while charging, and the cable usually comes free with the phone. What is the point of wireless charging pads?

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Just use wired. Wireless is a proof-of-concept technology that is just worse.

    Like… image if wifi required you to put your phone directly on top of the router… and it’s much slower… might as well just use the ethernet.

    Maybe if wireless charging one day works throughout an entire building, we no longer need to charge anymore.

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      First, you’re just wrong. You know there are 2 amp wireless chargers, right?

      And you’re missing a group that gains MASSIVE benefits from wireless charging, which is the disabled. Imagine your hands never stop shaking and you either have to try to fiddle a USB C into an Itty bitty slot, or just plonk the phone down on a puck. Which one would appeal to you?

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      No, it’s the ports on phones that are proof of concept, constantly getting full of dust or just stop working correctly. I’ll take a wireless charger, thanks.