The filibuster is expected to go through the night, against fast-tracked nominees by the Trump Administration. Booker’s protest appears to be in response to a recent wave of Republican nominees being fast-tracked through the confirmation process, many of whom are aligned with Trump’s second-term agenda and Elon Musk’s increasingly influential role in federal advisory circles.

  • vvilld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why are you pretending like they’re not doing that anyways? There are people right now lined up outside NIH and HHS buildings because DOGE has shut them out and is firing them. The last of the USAID workers lost their jobs yesterday. Yet you’re here pretending like allowing the CR to pass prevented people from losing their jobs? Brother, you’ve been duped into being a collaborationist!

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Those terminations are either of probationary employees (less than two years in role), or are currently being challenged by the courts. Project 2025 outlines a complete replacement of all hired federal employees with loyalists.

      • vvilld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        So you are admitting that passing the CR did nothing to protect these jobs you seem so concerned for? Then why are you arguing so fervently in favor of Vichy collaborationists?

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’m not. I’m saying it was a lose/lose. People who make it seem like leverage don’t understand the effects of a shutdown and how the EO would allow Trump to complete that massive step in no time.

          I’m not a fan of Schumer, or any centrists for that matter. Every candidate besides Schumer and Gillibrand dropped out before the primary. I’m hoping AOC runs a NY Senate bid in 2028 so we can finally get the deadwood out.

          • vvilld@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Right, it was lose/lose. Either way bad things are going to happen. So why sign on to participate and take ownership of it? What does anyone gain by that.

            The situation would not be worse under a shutdown. It would just be a different type of bad. Trump and Musk are still firing anyone they want without regard to the law or courts. They’re still gutting funding wherever they want.

            The ONLY difference between passing this CR and not is that the Vichy Democrats put their stamp of approval on what’s happening now.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              The alternative would be a much faster replacement of the non-essential workforce. I’m not defending it. I’m stating Schumer’s reasoning because I’m sick of people painting it as if we somehow had full control of a situation and gave it away. It’s just not that simple.

              • vvilld@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m not claiming the Democrats had full control of anything. And no, a shut down would not have been much faster. It would have been more chaotic, but not faster. And maybe the chaos would have helped get more people into the streets resisting. I don’t know.

                But I do know that capitulating to fascists is never a good strategy. There has never once been a situation where capitulating to fascists has resulted in a better outcome. Schumer got played. You got played.