• Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was implying that by the description there, we should legitimately consider the people making up certain governments terrorist groups.

    • Smoogs@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I don’t disagree. Still not sure what motivated your idea that there was exemptions here.

      • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re right, the text itself doesn’t spell out any exemptions.

        I guess I was just (badly) trying to express my skepticism that our own media and/or society at large would be willing to apply this definition to our own local governments or government-adjacent orgs, even if they met the criteria.

        Which wasn’t really the point of this post anyhow I suppose… I’ll shut my trap now :)

        • Smoogs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Oh I see. Yes the media as well as who manipulates the media would be responsible for manipulating the perspective for sure. I agree with you there.