• eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    there were more than two choices and everyone predicted that repeatedly choosing the lesser evil will lead to this and here we are.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        24 hours ago

        there are third parties and independents and mexico & sheinbaum prove are viable once you stop drinking the 2-party kool aide

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          Mexico is not a purely FPTP system; there are elements of ranked choice at the national level for their legislature. That makes it possible for 3rd parties to build a power base an support sufficient to win the presidency, which is a FPTP election.

          Unless and until there is election reform to allow ranked-choice voting–which Repubs and Dems will both oppose, and which is illegal in some states–you can not realistically have 3rd parties winning. Unless and until 3rd parties build up their power by winning at state and local elections, they will not win national offices. Right now, 3rd parties have no foundation of power that they can use to win national elections.

          The closest the US has come in the last one hundred years to a 3rd party presidential win was H. Ross Perot, over 30 years ago. Before that, you have to look at Theodore Roosevelt’s Bull Moose party, right around the time of the Great War.