The background is Blue.
The words are MAGA.
I wonder if there is a term for this.
But my book says it’s our land. So we should put our book and their book in a ring to fight it out. The winner takes the land. This is the only logical solution to this problem.
“That thing we wrote says the land is ours, so of course it is. Why don’t these filthy savages believe in that thing we wrote?”
So if I write a book that says Chuck Schumer has to be my bitch, he has to do it?
It’s in a book after all
If you convince enough people with you’re book, sure.
Let’s start with vote 1
You also have to tell him that GOD actually wrote it.
Ah yes another but the bronze age man said so moment
if this bastard is a shill for zio’s, your country’s continued existence means opposing them, personally and politically, at every opportunity.
The term is “fucking traitor that needs to be censured and primaries”. Get this MAGAt wannabe out of office, but first get him out of any democratic positions/appointments.
Same logic evangelical Christians use to oppress LGBTQ folks here at home, Chuck. But you knew that, which is why you don’t care about that either, beyond your performative outrage to get votes.
These crusty old dirt worshipers need to go. Every last one of them.
so… third party this time?!?!
I wish I could say yes, and maybe between shit like this and Elon threatening Social Security there will be enough angry people to make a third party viable, but I’m not holding my breath on that. This country has been in love with binary choice since the beginning. Everything is black or white, good or evil, win or lose, right or wrong, us or them… You introduce any kind of nuance and people lose their fucking minds.
Nah. Just guns at this point.
Schumer is really letting the mask slip lately. Time for him to go.
There’s a mid term for this
Wow, I knew things were bad but I didn’t realize it was this bad.
Look at what he stands for.
Look at what he caves on.
Genocide is centrism’s only actual policy.
Even if you take what he says at face value, his conclusion still doesn’t even follow logically.
I recently did some wiki digging into the formation of Israel and it legitimately surprised me how illegitimate the country is. They were given land (not a state) and welcomed by Palestinians, then they flipped their shit over time and took everything. They were not oppressed but radicalized over imaginary oppression and used it as a tool to oppress Palestine.
The whole world is complicit or gaslit into buying this garbage. Insane that the two state solution is seen as compromise to Palestinians when it should be considered the only compromise given to Israel.
When I started to learn about it i thought it was the first account I had heard of documenting precisely why a country should never allow unchecked immigration… -Not that the palestinians were given much of a choice by their british colonizers.
This prompted me to do a wiki dig. TIL Israel was founded by an actual Jewish Nazi group and they even named a military ribbon after them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_(militant_group)?wprov=sfla1
In April 1948, Lehi and the Irgun were jointly responsible for the massacre in Deir Yassin of at least 107 Palestinian Arab villagers, including women and children. Lehi assassinated Lord Moyne, British Minister Resident in the Middle East, and made many other attacks on the British in Palestine. On 29 May 1948, the government of Israel, having inducted its activist members into the Israel Defense Forces, formally disbanded Lehi, though some of its members carried out one more terrorist act, the assassination of Folke Bernadotte some months later, an act condemned by Bernadotte’s replacement as mediator, Ralph Bunche. After the assassination, the new Israeli government declared Lehi a terrorist organization, arresting some 200 members and convicting some of the leaders. Just before the first Israeli elections in January 1949, a general amnesty to Lehi members was granted by the government. In 1980, Israel instituted a military decoration, an “award for activity in the struggle for the establishment of Israel”, the Lehi ribbon. Former Lehi leader Yitzhak Shamir became Prime Minister of Israel in 1983.
Dug up something called Banner of the Zionist Gang so I googled it and these are the first two images.
On the left is standard Soviet propaganda, racism included, and on the right is the symbol of the actual Jewish Nazi gang being sold on fucking Amazon
How about this as a compromise: all adults get to vote and the right to freedom of religion is unassailable. Why isn’t that on the table?
That’s the One State solution, and it isn’t on the table because it’s unacceptable to Israel.
Israel wants to be a Jewish state, so secular humanism wouldn’t be a compatible policy they’d agree to.
I don’t think there is a two state solution because of how intertwined the West Bank is.
I don’t think there is a one state solution because of how much all the sides hate eachother.
The whole area is a festering wound on the face of our common humanity. We need to administer antibiotic and depose the leaders who spread hate in the area from within and from the outside like Schumer here. “They don’t believe in the Torah”, why should any book have final say?
Edit: I have no idea why you’re getting downvoted. I wish what you were saying was possible. In any sane country it would be reasonable.
I understand that most nations were founded via genocide, but can you imagine feeling any pride on your country whatsoever when the whole world is regularly watching 4K footage of your nation bombing destitute women & children?
Like, goddamn.
Israel is forever cursed by its own cruelty.
I just wrote a book that says that Chuck Schumer’s house is on my ancestral homeland, because my deity says so. That makes it Chuck’s fault when I drop bombs on it.
Does it have to be written in a book to qualify? I’m pretty sure there are several Native American tribes that might have something to say about this.
I’ll happily bind up some pages into a book for you.
I’m sure it has to be written in a book for Chuck Schumer to think it qualifies.
It’s insane how many people have died because of arguments over who has the best Invisible Friend.
What’s even worse is they all have the same invisible friend, it’s just their rules that are different. God, Allah, Jehovah, Jah, YHWH, whatever you wanna call him, all the same guy. But somehow all the rules about what you’re allowed to do and how you need to worship, those are all in different books written by different people at different periods in history.
I guess monotheistic religions just have in common that everyone believes in their own truth, and instead of accepting the differences, feel the need to go to war over it.
Maybe all those religions need to be banned, and only allow heno- or polytheistic ones. Especially the polytheistic religions seem much more exciting. But of course it is much more difficult to control the common folk with those.
