• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    How is it even legal to have explicitly preferential pay for people not in a union? Is there a limit to that, or can companies just say, “Anyone who joins a union will be paid minimum wage.” Ofc with at-will employment they can always just fire you, but like, if you think about it it’s pretty fucked up right?

    • Sheldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      I don’t think it’s preferential pay. It’s just that they pay more, somebody in the union also can get more money than the union minimum. Somebody not part of the union can get less or more than somebody in the union, just not below the union minimum.

      It’s not that if they join the union that they get less money. The union + 0.5 just means that they earn better than the minimum and the employer gives them more than the minimum, because people like that.

      At least that’s how it works where I live and union contracts are common.

      Not everyone part of the union has to get exactly the union minimum, it’s just that you cannot legally get less. People might not be part of the union but they still fall under the union contract negotiated by the union, because it applies to the entire company.

      • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        So even then, the union people might be making more than the union minimum, so the non union person might still be making less than an average union person while not getting any union benefits.