Why in the flying fuck are my tax dollars going to fuckin harvard?!?!
Edit: I admit I 100% did not think about research grants and I also admit I am forever skeptical of any university’s budget and financing regardless if they’re public or private. Nothing about higher education operating costs adds up to me.
Not OP but I’ll leave this comment on their behalf, why does that change what OP was asking? They didn’t ask if one cause the other just if one thing could lead to another. Wouldn’t one symptom like a market crash happening first, then be followed by the other symptom being the ww3 still qualify under OP’s question? Regardless if they share the same cause. Or am I looking at it wrong?
To elaborate on my rake of the question: The genocide of jews by Germany caused ww2. A symptom was the active engagement in the pacific, aka pearl harbor, which had the symptom of the US joining the war in full force.
The tariffs in the eyes of the markets is no different than the grand opening of rhe covid pandemic. Tons of uncertainties, tons of money moving around, all causing markets to crash or semi-crash like they are now.
*Quick side bar of my own oppinion, I don’t think they’ve dropped enough to meet the criteria to be considered a crash but I could be wrong. I’ll google it and edit accordingly if im wrong tho. Personally I know the tariffs are idiotic but anyone calling doomsday or market crash over a 3 month drop accross the board shouldnt be wasting money investing their own money and should leave it up to professionals.
Regardless of which idiot is at the reigns, what catastrophe is happening, if you looking at your investments every three months, you are not investing you are gambling. The entire financial institution as an industry is going to make fuck you money off this dip. It’s literally why it’s dipping, it’s call mitigating losses by rolling your investments according to their capital gains tax priority. Every financial firm right now is selling on Monday and buying the same fucking stock back at a cheaper price and at a higher volume. They’ll continue losing money but at a lesser rate of loss with higher intrinsic value because they’re bulking their portfolio at the same time.
I barely know dick about investing but I know enough to say market movement does not need an economic movement to follow. We can have sorting inflation, rising cost of living, annual raise %'s less than the % of inflation and at the same time the markets could be soring. It’s literally been happening to the nasdaq big tech industry which is large enough to prop the markets thru whatever rhe economy throws at it.
The pandemic was a fuckin crash. That shit was fuckin wild. And still i wanna say it was back to hitting ATH’s by the end of Bidens 1st year.
Its because markets not giving a fuck about any country’s economic wellbeing, who is in office, and especially because it sure as shit doesn’t give a fuck about any individual investor are all parts of why I don’t think the current state of the markets will lead to any radical military action from any country.
My tldr of my answer to the og original OP’s question is:
Markets not giving a fuck about any country’s economic wellbeing, who is in office, and especially because it sure as shit doesn’t give a fuck about any individual investor are not opinions they are well documented statements of fact. All the individual investors in the word no longer hold enough market share to influence what the markets do anymore, markets are unaffected by who was elected president and my citation is to ask any financial advisor, and we just saw that the economy can go to the shitter but markets didn’t move till the variable of tariffs were introduced.
A global scale war can only happen when there are enough solder committed to the fight. That’s just my opinion. You can implement as many drafts as you want but until the solders have reason for themselves to fight you’ll only end up with shit like Vietnam, Iraq, and Ukraine. All wars but all without any drive for the soldiers to fight for. It’s because of my first point that I don’t think what the markets do will affect people’s mind set enough to charge the beaches of Normandy.
The nail in the coffin for the market dropping causing war is the fact that the quality of everyday life hasn’t gotten so bad that they would be willing to risk their life yet. Sounds morbid to say but now that we’ve seen the markets have detached from its dependency of economic growth or needing joeshmoe to invest in shit to keep the markets up I feel confident in my opinion.
Plus, who in the flying fuckwants to fight in a war when they can juat fight anonymously on the internet?loljkjk
Edit: stupid fucking ai autocorrect apparently likes to correct the proper spelling of soldiers to solder🙄 Fuck it I’m leaving it lol
100% my own opinion as a 37y/o male who would never find myself in this scenario. This isn’t a commentary on any other scenarios or sexual preferences except imagining myself in OP’s presented scenario.
No - Then fuckin roll the dice.
Yes w/o asking 1st - Then it’s incredibly creepy if they find a porn of themselves in your possession and opens a can of worms about what means you used to make it and the integrity of that means to protect the created porn from being viewable by others.
Yes w/asking 1st - Then prepare for an incredibly awkward conversation where you explain why you’d rather spend time making an AI porn of the person you’re fucking instead of spending the time with them or actually romancing/fucking them. Even if they aren’t completely turned off by this scenario then you still look like an ass for wanting to use AI to make porn of SO instead of just asking them to record your own together.
Long distance/extended periods of time away for each other.
Disabilities where sex is off the table.
SO already has public accessible media of themselves fucking.