Step one: I clone my phone allowing two phones to contact my past self.

Step two: “Lose” one phone, after turning on find my friend on the lost phone.

Step three: Send past self false information while keeping constant tab on the assassin who believes they have an edge.

Step four: Hit the assassin before they hit me.

Having read through the other comments I think this is the winner. This person needs to read a book. What a wild hill to die on.

…someone starts filming it. Then it’s evidence.

Entrapment mostly.

Taking a penny instead of leaving a penny.

This except toasted on a frying pan and maple syrup instead of honey.

Go waste someone else’s time.

I know exactly what they asked and the answer is still “no”.

If you aren’t a mental health expert you aren’t equipped to ever make mental health judgement.

Ah yes Youtube, the bastion of medical education.

Fact of the matter is I am right and I am not here to argue about it.

No, there is not a way for a layman to spot mental health issues and reliably diagnose them. This is true across the board regardless of circumstances because mental health issues constantly overlap and require a lot of work to properly diagnose at a professional level.

We need this shit off of Lemmy. It’s so irritating I am almoat ready to throw in the towel and never come back here.

Do come back if you ever find a location on the internet that is bot free. Might be hard considering automated activity accounts for over 50% of internet traffic.

But on point, you absolutely do not have the ability to judge if someone is a bot or not. Even if the program used isn’t super sophisticated. If you are worried about it report and move on. No need to announce you will leave because no one actually cares if you do. We don’t know you.

The prohibition of drugs is harmful.

When did I say it wasn’t?

Do try not to quote me out of context this time.

Your position is asinine and wrong, which is the point of this entire thread.

What is my position?

edit oh like I said, you ignored the parts of the last comment which would humiliate you. you can try to ignore them to keep that thought away, but even when you delete the comments, the idiocy will remain. your need to up your rhetorical game.

Posted a comment and edited within 2 minutes because you forgot to attempt an insult, yet I am the one who is “provoked” and “angry”.

Stay mad homie.

I stand by everything I have said. Made clear by the lack of editing done.

Maybe stop quoting me out of context. You may understand why you are wrong.

You keep moving your goalposts.

The goal post was to answer the questions posed. You still haven’t and the posts haven’t moved.

It’s so easy to provoke you. All I need to do is to quote you back to yourself and you’ll get red in the face.

I think you may have reached a point beyond projection, in a realm known as total delusion. The only one provoked here is obviously you. Easily verified by you putting everything “important” in bold(pretentious much?), attacking anyone who responds to you, all while pretending you are some enlightened individual who just has to be listened to for the good of man kind.

Sorry to burst your bubble but you aren’t special, intelligent, or worth listening to. Which is why I continue to ignore what you are saying. Which I explicitly told you I was going to do.

I do have to give you some credit though. The fact you have kept this going for almost a week is rather impressive. Sad, but impressive.

I cannot wait for the next mess of a comment you decide to post!

Go ahead and stand by your words anytime you are ready. Feel free to copy paste my questions, and put the relevant rant that “answers” any one of them below the quoted question. If you can answer all four with what you have previously written in your comments I will go back and answer every single sentence you ended with a “?”.

Otherwise, I will just keep doing what I am doing. Which is showing this thread to my spouse, and anyone who finds chronically online nut jobs humorous, and laughing at you until we all get bored and move on with life.

On that note, there is a lot of hope that you will continue responding as we are drinking now and having a great time. If you do not mind continuing with whatever it is you are doing that would be greatly appreciated by approximately 5 people.

Cheers!

A bit ashamed you were wrong? It’s okay. It’s the internet. It’s full of people like you saying dumb shit they can’t back up and get flustered about. There’s nothing to be ashamed of.

I know it is hard, because I cannot find it in me to listen to you, but you should at least listen to yourself. ;)

Your commitment to this fantasy in your head is rather impressive, even if it is really sad.

You just have to reply, but you can’t address anything

Pot calling the kettle black much?

Nothing is stopping you from not replying.

I think you are missing the real question here. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

You asked for books. That was the first question you had,

From the top:

Did you ever stop to think that the propaganda you speak of is directly influenced by exactly what steeznson was speaking about?

First question asked.

Why do you believe that anti-drug propaganda only began in the 20th century?

Second.

Do you have anything other than wikipedia links to back your stance up? Say, a real study done on the impacts of anti-drug propaganda through the ages which demonstrates that the 20th century was the most militant with it?

Third.

Do you know what Religion is, and its impacts on anti-drug mentalities predating the 20th century?

Fourth.

Then you said this:

If you’re honestly interested, you can find tons of literature.

and I said, without posing a question:

Name 10 books on the subject including the authors.

A strong reader would notice the lack of “?” at the end of that sentence, meaning it wasn’t a “question”.

Do you understand how punctuation works?

Did you forget that I said I would be ignoring you moving forward? Which to clarify doesn’t mean I won’t respond. It means I will ignore what you are saying and respond to whatever catches my fancy. Which is obviously making you big mad.

I find it quite funny, which is the only reason I am choosing to continue. You are a joke to me and as long as you keep delivering the punchlines, I will keep coming back with responses that fire you up.