

It makes perfect sense, he’s asking for positive examples.
It makes perfect sense, he’s asking for positive examples.
The vast majority of them are just fine, like with most tourists. The problem is there’s just massively large number of them in many tourist destinations compared to other countries (at least where I live), which means you more frequently see one acting poorly too.
The Americans are somewhat the same, we also get a lot of them.
That being said, even though most of the issues are because of sheer numbers it doesn’t mean there aren’t a few key cultural differences which can play a role in western locations being offended by Chinese behaviour.
The big one with China is that culturally there’s no expectation that you treat a stranger respectfully, the person you’re dealing with needs to earn your respect rather than having it by default. This comes across as quite rude to many other countries when you only have a single interaction with this person.
This isn’t a Chinese only issue though, Americans can also be quite rude depending on where they’re from and how they were raised, a good chunk of them are entitled assholes who think the world revolves around them when they visit.
It will not bring equality, it just reverts to might is right.
It’s a good thing Trump didn’t pay attention in high school then.
You asked what would it look like, and I gave you a realistic answer. There’s no way that type of economy could exist in the real world, it’s never been done, and there’s plenty of evidence showing it failing even in small groups of people.
Worked for millenia until the rise of capitalism
No it didn’t, we’ve had states for literally six to eight thousand years or more and capitalism for about three hundred years.
States have existed essentially since the moment the population of specific area became large enough to become a city.
Because again, as I said earlier, you can’t have completely stateless groups larger than hundreds of people, if just doesn’t work.
If tariffs were good for an economy, everyone would use them all the time
The fact that so many countries have free trade agreements or very low tariffs are proof that they’re good for economies in general.
They don’t, mutualistic economics doesn’t work at scale because human nature doesn’t let it.
It can work with a small enough group, but will break before you even reach 1000 individuals.
It wouldn’t work, there wouldn’t be nearly enough contribution to cover a military with any useful amount of force. There’s zero chance you can get tens of millions of people to donate enough money voluntarily to support such an endeavor.
Militaries are extremely expensive, especially in the modern world. In Canada for example we have about 100,000 citizens per aircraft in the airforce, and about half a million citizens per boat in the Navy.
What the drunk…
It wouldn’t work.
In order to have a military, you’d have to have at least one or more dedicated people, those people would need to be supported with resources and given that it’s a stateless society there’s zero chance that enough people would voluntarily choose to help them to allow them to operate effectively outside of a wartime event without requiring some sort of payment from everyone and then you’re back to having a state.
Since when is renal failure a death sentence? We can keep people alive for decades without even having kidneys with regular hemo-dialysis machines. Kidney transplants are super common too.
I assume there are other significant injuries that aren’t fixable?
I’d actually commend them and give them financial advice regarding it’s longevity, it’s a high income job but your income drops as you age so it would be good to put a lot of it away or invest some in a secondary income source for when you transition out. This is also true for many other jobs which are reliant on peak physical function/visuals such as modelling or professional sports
Why do I care about the difference between using your hands to rub someone’s muscles (a massage therapist) and using a different body part to rub a different body part?
There’s nothing special, secret, or wrong about having sex, it’s just a normal everyday human activity. Use appropriate protection and go for it.
Do you work a job? You’re a whore too.
You’re selling your body for money.
The sex aspect is irrelevant, stop being a puritanical religious zealot.
A lot of republicans do live in a bubble yes, they either do not pay attention to the news at all, or only get it from sources that are heavily biased or even censored.
News flash, your assumption that they’re using secure phones is false.
If you want to use the microwave for this, pop in a plate with some water, then heat it up for 1-2 minutes, take it out with something that doesn’t absorb water (or the hot water will wick through the material to your hand and burn you) dump the water in the sink and quickly wipe with a dish towel to dry before using.
Other methods include warming it in an oven set very low, or heating it in hot water from a sink.
In a restaurant, they may just grab a plate that has just come out of the dishwasher since industrial dishwashers are really fucking hot.
That ain’t how the current supreme court interprets it, so let them eat cake.
If the supreme court agrees, we’ll get to test how well the second amendment helps maintain a free country.
I’m going to assume it does nothing, and all the gun deaths were for nothing.
That’s not what I was taught or experienced firsthand while I was there.