People who think Science and Religion are opposed to one another don’t understand either one.

What is science? Observing how to world works and learning from that.

What is religion? Philosophy (Here how you should behave, and how to live a good life)

Science has no reason to argue with religion, because religion is not scientific. There is nothing that can be proven or disproven.

Religion has no reason to argue with science, because whatever religion believes about the origin of the world, science just seeks to better understand that world. Knowing how electrons move is not an affront to God.

Arguing Science vs Religion is like arguing Painting vs Music. Sure, they’re both art but they are completely different and do not overlap. There are plenty of scientists who follow one religion or another.

There is no article or comments in this thread about protests or attempts to halt this adminstration, nor anyone trying to discourage such actions.

Less than a third voted for him, too. Millions are disenfranchised and millions more recognize that there is no correlation between desires and outcomes when it comes to voting.

And these millions that couldn’t even bother to vote expect other countries to come save them?

Canada is also specifically targeting red states with retaliatory tariffs. Somehow I doubt that is the sort of “help for the American people” OP is asking for.

Why not?

Because it would justify any retaliation (including military) from Trump and his sycophants.

Of the people that were of age, were able, and did vote, just over half voted for Trump

Right, over 50% of people who did vote voted for Trump, and unless your arguing that everyone that did not vote did it as a result of voter suppression or intimidation, the % of people that just chose not to vote adds to the % of the population that were fine with this.

If the “popular vote” went to Kamala there would be an argument to be had, but it didn’t. By all available evidence this is what the USA voted for. Why is it the responsibility of other countries to intervene in what people voted for?

assuming voting tallies were accurate.

Provide some evidence that they weren’t and you’ll be far more likely to get support from other countries.

The collapse of the US will not, and is not happening in a vacuum

Correct, and I do not fault any government for not sending money to resistance groups in the US that they could be using to support their own population in the coming economic crash.

This just sounds like more selfish Americentrism, “Why aren’t other countries doing more to help America? Yes, America did it to it’s self, and now if other countries don’t spend considerable resources helping us then they are just being selfish!”

Providing support and resources for movements that are opposed to Project 2025 and the rise of fascism would be nice

So you expect countries with smaller militaries (ie. all of them) to openly fund groups opposing a democratically elected leader?

but at the least how about drawing a distinction between the fascists and anti fascists

We recognize the distinction, but you have to be aware that you are unfortunately a minority in the country. Less than a third of Americans actually voted against this.

Not everyone in Russia supports the war in Ukraine, and I 100% support anyone trying to leave Russia or the Russian military, but Russia as a country can get fucked and needs to collapse for the good of the world.

“nobody wants to work”

True, that’s why you have to pay them to get them to do it.

so many countries and people are saying good luck, get fucked.

What specifically do you think other countries should be doing?

“Whoops, the judge ordered us to release them because we did not actually charge them, but they’re already in an El Salvador prison 🤷‍♀️”

And there was no one left to tell.

The people doing this don’t care who you tell if nobody is going to do anything other than film from the sidelines and complain.

Oh noes!

So you’re ignoring the entire point just to be pedantic?

It would be illegal for anyone else to step in with a firearm

It’s also illegal for people in plain clothes to abduct women off the street.

First they came for those with student visas
And I filmed from the sidelines.

https://lemmy.ca/comment/15444806

Why would you respond to a question you have no interest in answering?

I replied asking you a specific question that you refused to answer. If you didn’t want to answer the question I asked you shouldn’t have replied to me instead of trying to dance around it. Simple as that.

So ignoring what’s actually being discussed and just being pedantic. Got it.

I never said anything about if I approve of doxxing the owners or not.

And I am specifically asking you, given your comment I replied to, if you approve doxxing the owners or not.

So you’re ignoring the entire point just to be pedantic?