You know what I meant and you’re not denying it.

I’m glad we agree you’re a complete moron.

I’m a disenfranchised felon dipshit, you’re tanking your argument with that alone.

Ed: nice to know you jumped straight to assuming I didn’t vote and moreover that I didn’t do it for moral reasons thus pricing my point that you know no nuance you’re just a fuckin bigot.

Everyone named plastic/ramses is a complete moron.

Depends on the Wangdoodle.

Dolphins are known for their intelligence, promiscuity and absurdly dexterous penises. They have a prehensile penis, meaning it can swivel, grab and grope, much like a human hand. A prehensile penis helps males navigate the complex, labyrinth-like reproductive tracts of female dolphins.

Oh I’m sure visitors come from all around.

Anyone who didn’t vote is especially responsible.

Fucking dumbasses that they are.

Excuse me for missing that finally refined nuance.

They didn’t add any nuance and they doubled down, why would I think more or less than what is said.

Ed: >Anyone who didn’t vote is especially responsible.

Fucking dumbasses that they are.

Where’s the exception, where’s the nuance? Oh then maybe be like oh shit sorry I could be more clear, instead of “that’s not what I said” which is factually incorrect.

It’s literally what you said and doubled down on bud.

I already said there are reasons people couldn’t vote that are beyond their control like felon disenfranchisement.

You understand reasons exist beyond ideological ones correct?

Sure.

Yeah that doesn’t magically make them not disenfranchised felons, voting would just be committing a fairly serious crime.

That’s fucked up Nazi shit bud.

Or felons or disenfranchised for some reason it another.

Chill, some people have reasons and maybe they aren’t all worse then actual fascists. I’d say likely most aren’t but dehumanization is also fun though I guess.

I specifically and in multiple specifically said we’re not taking about court. Yes she’s not aware aside from it being an immensely well known rumor especially right now but sure, it’s not like she’s famous for her social media acumen… Oh wait.

That doesn’t make it not evidence, yet again that wouldn’t make it good evidence in your opinion. Two separate things though the awkward aggression is a neat addition to this particular exchange.

I’m sorry, again what court are we in?

Regardless, you’d call grimes as a witness and in civil court you do not have a fifth amendment right, they have to answer truthfully and make it no longer hearsay.

If you’re going to be tedious throw a little logic in there to save us both the time.

It absolutely is there are hearsay rules both federally and at the state level that determine what weight to give hearsay. Criminal law is different, but even then hearsay can be admissable, it just isn’t by default.

Federal rules of evidence basically 801 to 807, 803, 805 and 807 (?) are specific exemptions. Notably in civil court they’d object to hearsay and the resolution is to call the person who is claimed to have said or done whatever as a witness and get their testimony making it no longer hearsay.

Said specifically that he only likes soldiers who don’t get captured to a (granted) peice of shit who happened to be a pow (which was his own fault but that’s another story.)

Are you saying top Republicans are power bottoms?

“We’re clean on opsec”

It’s still the funniest part, a. Just super super wrong generally b. He wants so much to be socom, instead he’s a pathetic drunk in charge of our military arsenal… life is fun.

Active war planning is scif unless there is some overwhelming reason someone has to be remote. Doing “dope shit in Russia” is a bad excuse for not being somewhere much more so when it’s an adversarial nation who’s constantly monitoring and trying to break into government devices.

Correct.

That’s not a counterargument that’s a bad attempt to strawman. Similarly there are zero age restrictions on an SBA loan, none zero.

There’s no need to defend against either, they’re both legal.

Probably, that doesn’t change the fact that it wouldn’t be illegal even if the ages are correct.

I mean if you assume her title is an intended insult it makes a lot more sense.