Tech leaders who once backed Trump

Once, meaning, until about two months ago.

Explain to me me how “someone told you in private” would ever apply to this Derek character leaking a group chat. What is private about a group chat?

Obviously I’m talking about the guy that forwarded juicy messages someone sent him privately to his buddies in this leaked group chat.

Even though I don’t think my original comment leaves much wiggle room for interpretive play, maybe I could have explained better. But maybe you’re a bit too eager to find people to recreationally chastise.

I think you think I’m agry with the wrong person. Who do you think my statement was directed against?

My problem was not with Derrick?

The abuse of trust is the problem there, not the trust itself…

There’s no scenario where you’re not the a-hole if you’re going to parrot something someone else told you in private, elsewhere.

We don’t disagree I think, but I feel people in general are too blasé about who they allow themselves to be set up against. This is a recurring theme. People with a slightly bigger house or nicer car aren’t the enemy. Nobody who has to show up to work for a living is the enemy. Neither is anybody reliant on social programs.

Cirtainly not as long as we have things like corporations that book millions, if not billions in profit years on end yet have to be bailed out with public money after a few months of pandemic.

I’ve definitely got some bleak ass humor with some friends in private but forwarding messages people sent you in private to other people and group chats? Really?

Yes, take public transport, from suburbia…

I was wondering why we haven’t seen any actual data on how they’ve saved the US money yet. The answer is likely that they didn’t.

I’m not defending Tesla anywhere, you can cite me where you think I did. Volkswagen and Porsche have well documented actual Nazi history and is therefor precisely relevant here, especially in the context of where I named them. And you need learn to construct a coherent sentence, because I had to read this word chaos no less than three times to make sense of it.

For me this entirely revolves around why why’s and how’s when it comes to how that affects the ethics of it.

With a defense type scenario I’d likely have a hard time looking at myself in the mirror if I just left and essentially allowed my home to be taken.

If we are the aggressor because we stepped in some horrible turd electorally then they chose this and therefore no thanks bye i’ll send a postcard.

This map doesn’t load on my Librewolf browser with Privacybadger which is something I find moderately concerning and why I looked at the source in the first place, so i’m going to draw a line here in drilling down into this pointless discussion if you don’t mind.

Not in the least because you shouldn’t be doxxing anybody in the first place.

That’s BS. But to entertain this, straight from their page source:

DOGEQUEST is the ultimate hub for fans of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to map and explore DOGE related landmarks. We also connect Tesla Motors owners with each other, using our AI-driven networking features.

That’s not how I read this (excerpt from article):

Dogequest,’ the recently launched website which is doxing some Tesla owners and members of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and putting their personal information on a searchable map

You need to look at my reply in the context of the news I’m replying to.

This website is for publishing name and address info of people.

The most innocent thing that can reasonably come from that sort of activism are threats of which you can only hope are just that.

Im not saying to not boycott Tesla. Im saying Tesla isn’t hurt by damaging or destoying someones private property.

But most or all. You don’t need to freaking dox it’s owners to key or even entirely destroy a Tesla…

People don’t need to get hurt or worse over their car. I don’t care what justification you make up in your head for it that is just wrong on all levels.

In her video, Sotomayor said a third flight attendant told her to remove the equipment and said her son would “be OK until we’re in the air at a high enough altitude.”

Are they backed by medical degrees or something that they feel they can make these assertions?

Well it is fairly majestic if I do say so myself.

Yes it did. I changed that to be somewhat less insensitive.

I love how you’re just ignoring the meat of my reply…