Can you expand on that?
Can you expand on that?
I have to try that, thanks for the idea!
My bad, I tried to use a logical definition of inflation in a logical country. They are definitely considered in my country.
If the biggest costs of living are not considered in the metric for cost of living increase, WTF.
I’ll update my comment
Housing and groceries are part of the inflation…
Edit: seems the previous line might not apply to the US because insanity.
The real issue is that inflation only accounts hire much more things cost, but not the trend on salaries. If salaries and costs follow the same slope, you’re “even”. The problem is when costs increase at a faster rate than income.
Sure I’ll accept I got all the details wrong. That doesn’t really matter to my point.
This made me chuckle.
“Women with many children are heroes! We have to praise them, give them medals!”
“What about child support instead?”
“Hahahhahah, good one”
I always wonder what compels some people to make so little effort to understand what they are replying to, but make so much effort in proving they have no idea what they are replying to. Can you explain?
There are also non finished goods, like car components. Components from other tariff regions and US labor costs won’t have that much, but there finished product will have a price hike
Given the effect on the climate due to pollution, even rain or lack of can be explained by corporate greed
Not really. If they keep the same % based on what it costs them, then it should increase by the same amount.
If they instead get the same amount (which would effectively mean reduce their margins) the final cost would be a bit less.
Happy to be corrected with some numerical example.
So if you see any price increase greater than the tariff amount, it’s plain corporate greed.
Wow, you drop the act very quick.
I agree with you it’s in nobodies interest to keep the wars going. But even you know Russia will attack again, and only want to have a weaker opponent later. It’s indeed on the interest of the imperialist aggressor that there’s no resistance.
It’s tiresome that non argument that the only way to stop is for Ukraine to surrender. That they are the ones that want war for defending. “I can only tell my country” my ass. You’re telling your opinion on the internet. I can tell Putin to go die on a trench if he wants war so much.
I love how you say this isn’t good vs evil, then basically say that Russia is justified because NATO is evil. So attack a non NATO country who they had previously attacked because that’s what good ones do.
Fucking hell the absolute degeneracy to even make this shit up.
Ohh I see. Let’s give Russia a piece, and they will stop for good. What about Crimea? Ups, they already took that and weren’t satiated. I guess we have to give all. Seems the humane thing to do.
I know you’re just lying to gain points, but I don’t think anybody would fall for that.
You say “negotiate”, but mean “surrender”. Surrender land, people, rights…
It’s funny it’s up to Ukraine to stop the war. The one being attacked. The one attacking can’t do anything to stop itself. Just not possible. It’s the fault of the small country and the one aiding. Of course there would be no war if they had managed to conquer it all in three days, but this belligerent Ukrainians didn’t want to, so there’s war. “It’s only rape because you resist” mentality there.
And BTW, they are open to negotiate. Just not with a knife to the neck.
Marijuana is Marihuana and Smiley is not adapted, so it’s still Smiley.
The cross and the skull being 1 and 3 I have no idea what means.
It seems that he’s planning to make it so that people can afford to have families with subsidies and better salaries… Right? Or is his open to ease the processes of immigrating to the US so that new people can contribute to social security?
I’m sure it’s one of the two. Or both
/s, of course
Seems that the constitution or and law book would work too.
I want peaceful and lawful change. I’m open to other means.
https://lemmy.world/post/28379743
Well, it might officially happen soon.
The most honest answer you would get is “Another one?”
Anarchy isn’t just “no state”, is also non authority by force. Anarchic capitalists think that companies should rule and impose their will by force.