This is so wrong man. Jfc

Yeah I found that annoying as well. Sometimes you see it in long sentences too, and it really doesn’t need to be there. The sentence will flow without it.

Housed persons are peaceful. Unhoused persons are dangerous.

Literally if public housing was dispersed equally and equitably across a given city or area, as time goes by, unhoused people would housed people nearby anyone. They become peaceful by your logic.

The government might be able to do this using eminent domain, but people like you would oppose it in your neighborhood.

Everyone has to be onboard with this so the load on everyone becomes proportional and not disproportional.

And this is where American individualism gets in the way. People don’t value community, and so politicians would be hard pressed to get this done while being shunned from office come time for the next election.

How do you break down American individualism? By removing barriers between housed and unhoused people, doing outreach, having conversations, and lending a helping hand in redevelopment.

Sounds like you’re allergic to all of those though

And no one ever proposes where to build this housing. Sorry, but NIMBY, not around my children and home.

Tell me you don’t live in a city without telling me you don’t live in a city

Big brain