Might as well check out the Vagina Museum, too.

https://masto.ai/@vagina_museum

It’s why I get AMD for everything.

Party of crime and disorder

You said this much better than I did. One of the reasons why Democrats are called liberals.

Oh yeah, I think I was confusing in my response. I should have said:

All libertarian parties both in and outside of the United States don’t ascribe to your interpretation of the theory of libertarianism.

I included Australia as an example, but here is Canada’s platform as well.

https://libertarian.on.ca/platform/2011/environment Agreements among neighbours would be another factor that would replace top-down regulations.

I wish this were true, but what you are describing is more akin to the Democratic party’s platform. Laws by the Democratic party are passed so people and companies don’t violate the principle of non-aggression. For example, besides climate change, regulation on banking is to prevent banking from taking people’s money and just going out of business.

The Libertarian party doesn’t support the principle of non-aggression in practice. By this definition, the Democratic party would be the true libertarians or liberals.

For example:

Australia: https://www.libertarians.org.au/wa_platform

Ending Climate Alarmism Policies: Repeal state laws and subsidies tied to net-zero targets. Let the free market decide the energy mix.

And like you said, the US one too: https://lp.org/environment-energy-resources/

When governments try to tackle environmental issues (which is hypocritical, as governments are the largest polluters), they use a punishing approach that rarely, if ever, solves the problem

It means Elon gets free speech, not any of us. Elon is free to threaten a Judges daughter with no ramifications.

Anyone who is a libertarian is unfamiliar with game theory. Some problems happen when individual people act in their own self-interest, but the collective outcome is harmful. Climate change is a prime example.

You are absolutely right on everything and remember it all perfectly.

Invitation-only Mastodon instances prevent spammers by controlling who can join and maintaining a trust-based network. Since every new user must be invited by an existing member, admins can track invitation chains. If someone turns out to be a bad actor, admins can ban them and also ban anyone they invited. This is like pruning the whole spam network. This discourages spammers because their accounts can be removed along with their entire invitation tree.

Suffering from success, almost…

Sent in DM!

Yeah, I feel like this picture was made as satire.

Let’s just send the gold to North Korea and skip the middleman. /s

But seriously, they could fire all the straight white guys and things would actually run better.

This is just about corruption in the government. It’s easier to just pass the law that makes it legal.

Thank goodness we are deporting people close to retirement so they can spend their money in Colombia and not here in the US. Great for the economy. \s

Resign? They should be in jail. They used signal to get around FOIA laws.

Maybe people burning Tesla’s are all learning lessons, too.

This is literally the whole point of the government. To impose a law that helps everyone so the person who breaks the law doesn’t get rewarded.

So now everyone is going to suffer.