

it would be different if you were one of the people targeted i suppose and you are quite comfortable with them being murdered as long as you keep decorum maintained, that is the hill you are wanting to die on, decorum
it would be different if you were one of the people targeted i suppose and you are quite comfortable with them being murdered as long as you keep decorum maintained, that is the hill you are wanting to die on, decorum
its only several constitutional rights Michael, how much could it possibly cost? Just send the ones getting yippy
was there something special about him? seems like at a minimum you send actual criminals, and i know they are morons, but still was it truely just inny minny miney moe? Or was there something specifically about his and others on that flight that could show even more malevolence than incompetence?
no, you just dont like that you’re initial comment was immature and not well reasoned. I hope you never have to make the decision of whether you are willing to let your family get disappeared. Or maybe you prefer to be the person says it is better to ignore it to protect that status quo,
that is what the US is funding Israel to do, previous post had the amount of women and children around 500 killed, we do not know if the people the US is disappearing of the street and flying to other countries without due process are alive. I did not advocate for the murder of any babies, just pointing out that this is happening now with just a few of the tactics they are actively using against people they do not like.
Critical thinking is difficult to maintain in the age of social media, dont let yours atrophy especially if you are someone they do not like.
only a sith speaks in absolutes, also the previous post before this one was about how Israel has killed somewhere around 500 women and children and mass graved first responders for getting in the way of Israeli bullets, while due process has been paused in the US until further notice the post before that one
easier ways to dispose of surplus “people” than rigging a barn to explode. At the end of the day, we are just blood balloon waiting to be popped, also I am sure those “people” have families that would would likely be easier targets, all you need to do is mimic their tactics, show up at school, churches, and hospitals, anywhere they feel safe is a good target
thank you for correcting me, you appear to be right. For added context had o1 also give me the conventions of the two terms, “Despite” and “in spite of” are indeed very close in meaning: both convey “regardless of” or “not prevented by.” In modern usage, they’re essentially interchangeable. While “in spite of” can sometimes feel a bit more personal or emphatic—and in older or more formal contexts might suggest defiance—it typically does not carry a strong sense of “malice” or hostile intent. Most English speakers use “despite” and “in spite of” interchangeably without any intended ill will.
is this actually in spite, or despite? i’m sure there is some umbrage being felt, but I doubt that is the primary reason
they do that to their own officers who blow whistle on corruption or abuse, they also tend to do that to people they get the wrong address of