

51·
9 days agoI’m not disagreeing with that, I think you’re missing the point being made. The point is that we may not know that there might be more to it. That is all.
I’m not disagreeing with that, I think you’re missing the point being made. The point is that we may not know that there might be more to it. That is all.
Even if so, I believe that still doesn’t inherently mean it would be accessible by the public.
The comments seem to be missing the fact that elections are state run, so if he is allowed to run a third time, it won’t be him that broke the law it will be the states and their reps.