I’m pretty sure you’re replying to a joke.

I assumed it was a joke, but (correct me if i’ve misunderstood) I understood it as a joke rooted in the misconception that the US bombing of Yemen was a thing that happened 12 days ago rather than something that has continued every day since then.

If there is some way that this joke works in light of the fact that this article is from yesterday, I failed to grasp it.

We know. There was a group chat.

Did you? This story is about the 17 air strikes that happened yesterday. The attacks described in the group chat were the ones that happened 12 days ago.

The US has continued to bomb Yemen every day since then: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_2025_United_States_attacks_in_Yemen

imo the pejorative connotation of that word, and homophobia generally, is ultimately rooted in misogyny

deleted by creator

They were not “passing the time” (more than people on ISS always are… 🤡).

The decision was made in August that they would join the Expedition 71/72 crew.

As a result, Stephanie Wilson and Zena Cardman did not get to fly on Crew-9.

Yes they could go back to Earth in case of an emergency and would have to take the other passengers with them prior to the end of their missions.

It would have been prior to the end of their own missions as well, since they became members of Expedition 72.

They couldn’t not return to Earth simply because they decided they wanted to go back.

Do you think astronauts ever go to space with the expectation that they can “return to Earth simply because they decided they wanted to go back”? 😂

The fact is they were stranded.

The astronauts said “we don’t feel abandoned, we don’t feel stuck, we don’t feel stranded”, because they were prepared for this contingency. And they object to this nonsense framing too: “Help us change the rhetoric, help us change the narrative. Let’s change it to ‘prepared and committed.”

They couldn’t go back to Earth when initially planned, nor at any time before the following mission ended.

You are simply mistaken. At all times there were multiple options available for them to go back early if it ever became necessary to.

Changing the planned duration of a mission is not the same as being “stranded”.

As others have said, it depends on the city but probably yes.

For example, in San Mateo, California, it would be an offense under title 11 of the Municipal Code:

11.12.050 EXCESSIVE ACCELERATION OF MOTOR VEHICLES.

It is unlawful for any person operating a motor vehicle within the City to so accelerate the same as to cause audible noise by tire friction on pavement or to cause the tires of said vehicle to leave skid marks upon the pavement, except when such acceleration is reasonably necessary to avoid a collision. Any person violating this section shall be guilty of a public offense.

stranded astronauts from the ISS

The Facts Behind the Delayed Return of U.S. Astronauts

In response to Musk’s claims, several astronauts took to X to refute the idea that the astronauts were purposefully abandoned. Andreas Mogensen, a former SpaceX astronaut from Denmark, posted: “What a lie. And from someone who complains about lack of honesty from the mainstream media.” In response to Mogensen, Elon replied: “You are fully rеtarded. SpaceX could have brought them back several months ago. I OFFERED THIS DIRECTLY to the Biden administration and they refused. Return WAS pushed back for political reasons. Idiot.”

Mogensen responded by stating, “Elon, I have long admired you and what you have accomplished, especially at SpaceX and Tesla. You know as well as I do, that Butch and Suni are returning with Crew-9, as has been the plan since last September. Even now, you are not sending up a rescue ship to bring them home. They are returning on the Dragon capsule that has been on ISS since last September.”

Steve Stich, the program manager for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, said after the determination was made that Williams and Wilmore should not return on the Boeing Starliner, NASA officials met with SpaceX officials and considered “a wide range of options” and ultimately decided to attach the astronauts to the previously scheduled Crew-9 mission.

“When we looked at the situation at the time, we had a Crew-9 launch in front of us, it made sense to take the opportunity to bring Crew-9 up with just two seats and have Butch and Suni fill in and do the rest of the long duration mission,” said Dana Weigel, manager of NASA’s International Space Station Program.

“We thought the plan that we came up with made a lot of sense, and that, especially for Butch and Suni we know they’re experienced astronauts, they’re great in space,” Bowersox said. “We knew they’d be great additions to the crew and we knew that for most astronauts, spending extra time on orbit’s really a gift. And we thought they’d probably enjoy their time there. So we thought it was a good way to go … for a lot of reasons.”

see also: NASA astronauts — from space — discredit Trump claims they’re stranded

@alkbch@lemmy.ml is any of the above news to you, or were you aware of this already when you posted your “stranded astronauts from the ISS” comments?

The three currently-maintained engines which (at their feature intersection) effectively define what “the web” is today are Mozilla’s Gecko, Apple’s WebKit, and Google’s Blink.

The latter two are both descended from KHTML, which came from the Konquerer browser which was first released as part of KDE 2.0 in 2000, and thus both are LGPL licensed.

After having their own proprietary engine for over two decades, Microsoft stopped developing it and switched to Google’s fork of Apple’s fork of KDE’s free software web engine.

Probably Windows will replace its kernel with Linux eventually too, for better or worse :)

How else are Chrome, Edge, Brave, Arc, Vivaldi and co getting away with building proprietary layers on top of a copyleft dependency?

They’re allowed to because the LGPL (unlike the normal GPL) is a weak copyleft license.

BSD tells me the team probably wants Ladybird to become not just a standalone browser but also a new competing base for others to build a browser on top of

with mandatory male pronouns for users in the documentation.

(and no politics allowed!)