So much for the first amendment.

No need. That’s what articles 4 and 5 are for.

I’m starting to think that this guy might not understand how economies work.

Definitely this. Lemmy isn’t that big, so it pays to browse all. Just block any topic you don’t like. I had to block a lot of furry and meme communities because they don’t interest me.

BOY o BOY! It sure sounds like President Trump is in trouble this time!

How is left against accessibility? You say “traditionally”, as well.

I’m Canadian and these terms are not jiving with me.

Americans voted to screw over working-class Americans, don’t fucking try to kid yourselves.

Super convenient to pass the buck even when you get what you voted for.

Edit: Sorry, disgruntled Canadian here. But I did mean what I said.

I wish to be the most powerful genie!

Trump is definitely dumb enough to fall for it, but there’s no genie to grant his wish.

Ya, it doesn’t annoy me as much as I let on in order to set up the joke and I love hearing new ones.

The only thing that annoys me a bit is using them as a nickname instead of a punchline.

After watching/listening to this, I think Pennsylvanian Democrats just hoodwinked themselves (and the rest of America), looking for any alternative to Doc Oz

• John Fetterman And The Progressive Switcheroo - SOME MORE NEWS

I have a bit of a pet peeve when people use petty terms like fElon or Elmo. It just seems a bit childish and communicates that you’re only interested ad hominem.

But that was before I heard the moniker “Phony Stark”. I think we should always use this to refer to Elon because I think it’s hilarious.

Hey, at least this time he’s actually paying the people that do work for him.

Not only did Europe “need” help, but the US came out better off after WWI and WWII, while Europe was obviously worse. This is why the US is a superpower today.

I’ve never had any issues by adding the wrong people to a group, personally 🙂.

No, not for top secret stuff. That needs to be taken to official, secure channels.

Why is it just Democrats?

Sounds like it’s pretty easy to add the wrong people to your chat.

You forgot to mention that the German Reich and Israel are the states.

It’s not a big stretch, it’s a tiny stretch. There are not going to be more background checks if there are not laws in place.

I checked the first three and they all seemed the same or higher.

69 vs 85% for abortion according to your first link. Although clearly the number is from another source with different phrasing.

72 vs 68% according to your second source

And here’s a source for 90% on #3 - https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/90-percent-want-background-checks/

Anyway, I hate info graphics, too, but these hardly seem wrong or misleading.