It’s nice to see the senate opposition functioning.

Edit: 18 hours of holding the senate floor, giving voice to the american people. Lots of tears as american suffering is read out loud for the congressional record. Testiment from Americans across the country. This is the voice of the people. Please click the link, share and watch. The media needs to know we care about the opposition more than we care about trump rambling on a plane about fort knox.

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    So you don’t understand either, and are just assuming it’s the most effective way to go about it.

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      If I see a construction worker using a jackhammer on the side of the interstate, yes I assume they know what they’re doing until I see evidence to the contrary.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What if they’re doing it alone, in the middle of the night?
        I’d hope you think that was strange at least.

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          No not really actually. I see roadwork done at night all the time. They do it because there’s less need for the roads in the evening so blocking a lane or more is less impactful.

          See? Sometimes these things have more nuance and logic than you might think at first glance.

          • Steve@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            One guy.
            Alone.
            In the middle of the night.

            That would be very strange. Just like this guy speaking to an empty room in the middle of the night.

            It’s nearly as strange, that you don’t think it’s strange at all.

            • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              OK now you’re actually acting as if the specific details of your off the cuff metaphor are somehow truly relevant to the discussion at hand or in any way explain this situation with any level of granularity, so I’ll hold you to that: explain to me how this is like what you just described. Talk to me about how Booker is supposed to do something like this, and what is wrong with the way he did it.

              • Steve@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I don’t say things without thinking them through.

                You came up with the construction worker metaphor. Maybe you didn’t put any thought into that, I don’t know.

                I asked about if construction worker was working alone in the middle of the night. Just like Booker is talking to an empty room in the middle of the night.

                To me they both seem strange, and unlikely to be helping much.

                  • Steve@communick.news
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    An educated guess.
                    Even during a session, the room is mostly empty. They don’t bother listening to each others speeches most of the time. I’m sure nobody is bothering at 2am

      • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Democrats have been demonstrating they don’t know what the fuck they’re doing to combat this fascist shut for decades now. The benefit of the doubt has passed.

        Sure this was slightly better than rolling over, but this accomplished little

        • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You say it accomplished little yet here we are all talking about it.

          How much time and energy have you spent thinking about and talking about this subject today?

          How many headlines are out there about it right now?

          • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Think how much more we’d be talking about it if they did someone useful instead of performative for once…

            • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I get it’s edgy and cool to shit on people doing something other than whining on forums but maybe you should just shut the fuck up and contribute meaningfully to solving the problem instead of jeering from the sidelines?

              • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                I know it’s great pretending like the usual performative shit that Democrats have been doing for years will suddenly work this time, but telling people who’ve seen this same exact bullshit fail countless timeless to shuf up isn’t going to make it less useless this time around, either.

                  • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    He waited 3 months to do this little playacting. This is his job. I’ve been doing mine this whole time. He was phoning it in up until last night. Let’s not pretend this makes up for the Democrats’ subservience up until now.

    • Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dude, we all certainly understand this less than a sitting senator. Get off it.

      Maybe 7pm is significant, maybe it isn’t, but we are sitting here from our toilets still wiping the sleep from our eyes while this guy is giving a speech for 12 hours. Can we stop pretending we have any clue?

      • TronBronson@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        He’s going for the 24 hour record clearly so start time was irrelevant. He probably had a good nap before it started.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s a level of servility in this comment that is just downright distasteful.

        • Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I show no submission to authority. The point of my post, which was meant to be a jab at the armchair politicians / optics gurus / 4d strategists in this chain who were arguing over the effectiveness of starting at 7pm.

            • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              His argument is that when somebody is performing their job, you generally assume they know what they are doing

            • Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I used a slight appeal to authority to highlight the ridiculousness of the initial argument. I’m not typing out a million different nuances / hedging everything I say.

              Multiple things can be true at same time. I can acknowledge that a sitting senator obviously has some idea of what is / is not effective in terms of when / when not to filibuster while not bowing to the institution itself. Sorry I didn’t add three extra paragraphs about how despite being a US senator… Yada yada yada.