The Democrat delivered the longest Senate speech in history. We asked urologists one pressing question about it

One doctor thinks that Booker’s 25 hours without urinating means he needs to see a urologist:

“I think [Booker] needs to see a urologist,” says Dr Rena Malik, urologist and pelvic surgeon. “He probably has some real bladder dysfunction. That’s not normal. A normal person can’t do that.”

The 55-year-old Booker said that he stopped drinking in the lead up to the speech, so he wouldn’t need to use the toilet. Another urologist said this sort of dehydration isn’t a good idea:

“Dehydration can have serious consequences, particularly for older adults,” says Dr Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh, a urologist at Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian.

Was Booker’s speech worth the medical risks? I think it’s pretty impressive that he managed to do it.

  • SleafordMod@feddit.ukOPEnglish
    6·
    1 day ago

    True. There are definitely more praiseworthy things than not pissing for 25 hours.

    But still I think it’s rare to see a mainstream politician show such commitment.