cqst [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agothe perfect browserlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down10
arrow-up16arrow-down1imagethe perfect browserlemmy.blahaj.zonecqst [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-squarecommunism@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·20 days agoThat is definitionally not plagiarising. It follows IP law, which is the opposite of plagiarism.
minus-squarePrunebutt@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 days agoThere’s more than a legal definition of plagiarism. Plagiarism is when you sell the work of others as your own without attribution. There are bucketloads of examples of legal plagiarism. I’m pretty sure that everything H. Bomberguy discussed in his plagiarism video was legal, for example.
Ok, then call it “plagiarising”.
That is definitionally not plagiarising. It follows IP law, which is the opposite of plagiarism.
There’s more than a legal definition of plagiarism.
Plagiarism is when you sell the work of others as your own without attribution. There are bucketloads of examples of legal plagiarism.
I’m pretty sure that everything H. Bomberguy discussed in his plagiarism video was legal, for example.