"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoTRUCKIN'lemmy.worldimagemessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up1601arrow-down112
arrow-up1589arrow-down1imageTRUCKIN'lemmy.world"no" banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square116fedilink
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5·17 hours agoI have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·16 hours agoI’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
minus-squareHupf@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·15 hours agoWouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?
I have no concerns if he wants to force feed himself grain mash in the privacy of his own home. I draw the line at involving innocent waterfowl, though.
I’ll go one step further - even if the goose is convicted in a court of law they still shouldn’t be subjected to this.
Wouldn’t a goose be convicted by a court of kangaroos?