Op’s point was a challenge to the notion that Buttigieg is a leader of the Democratic party. They are getting briggaded for it.
Your response is a typical, two faced, backhanded way of dismissing the challenge. The kind of non-addiitve, toxic, snide, perspectives we always see from corporate democrats and their apologists. And its a legitimate question because obviously some media at least presents Buttigieg as a Democratic leader. And its a totally fair point to contend that Buttigieg is a leader for the Democratic party, if thats what you believe.
And since you are white knighting on their behalf, its totally fair to bring the question to you:
Asking who they want to see as democrat leaders is a typical, two faced, backhanded way of dismissing the challenge, the kind of non-additive, toxic, snide, perspectives we always see from corporate democrats and their apologists?
Here I though it was a valid question giving them a chance to say who they thought would be positive for the party.
Op’s point was a challenge to the notion that Buttigieg is a leader of the Democratic party. They are getting briggaded for it.
Your response is a typical, two faced, backhanded way of dismissing the challenge. The kind of non-addiitve, toxic, snide, perspectives we always see from corporate democrats and their apologists. And its a legitimate question because obviously some media at least presents Buttigieg as a Democratic leader. And its a totally fair point to contend that Buttigieg is a leader for the Democratic party, if thats what you believe.
And since you are white knighting on their behalf, its totally fair to bring the question to you:
Do you see Buttigieg as a Democratic leader?
Asking who they want to see as democrat leaders is a typical, two faced, backhanded way of dismissing the challenge, the kind of non-additive, toxic, snide, perspectives we always see from corporate democrats and their apologists?
Here I though it was a valid question giving them a chance to say who they thought would be positive for the party.