They only hate what Fox news tells them to hate. That’s why it’s so funny watching something controversial happen over the weekend. Republicans will have about 30-40 different takes and opinions until Fox News tells them what to think on Monday.

You mean like how every other country handles their constitution? That’s crazy talk.

None of that needs an app or touch screen.

Any basic household things that require an app belong in the trash.

Now do “progressives” that don’t understand the importance of voting.

The bigger problem is when the riots start so does martial law. That is the final step according to project 2025.

According to project 2025, the end of the line is martial law then full authoritarian dictatorship.

We have citizen IDs. If you really don’t understand the issue. Open a history book. I’ll even give you a starting point. Read about Jim Crow laws.

Okay, so don’t read any of the sources and stay ignorant. Homelessness can be a result of a multitude of factors and not all of them are only illegal immigrants who can’t be self-sufficient.

No where in any of the sources does it say the cost saved was because “they didn’t die”. It’s clear this goes far beyond your ability to understand and comprehend complex systems of cost analysis. You ask for sources then ignore them. Get bent.

I can provide a few, but honestly so many cities have done this, tried to do part of it and failed/succeeded, or are working on plans to do this. Portland Oregon for example had success with a homeless program that puts people in little 15x15ft sheds. It’s not much, but it’s a start and some have moved on to their own apartment. Years ago a city in Utah (I think), built a small apartment and did a study to determine it was more cost effective to provide housing than let them clog up the Healthcare and EMS resources.

One study found an average cost savings on emergency services of $31,545 per person housed in a Housing First program over the course of two years. Another study showed that a Housing First program could cost up to $23,000 less per consumer per year than a shelter program.

• Housing First
• Coalition for the Homeless
• PBS article comparing two cities
• National Alliance to End Homelessness

Here is a list of studies from the last link. Each pebble is a study with links and sources

Again, this is not something I’m just saying or making up. This has hard data backed evidence to support it.

Like the secretary of education in Idiocracy.

I am accounting for newcomers and not being self sufficient.

In the studies and actual use cases where places have done this the homeless person is getting a 300-500sqft apartment. It’s enough to get off the street have a clean bed and running water. They can then get a job and work their way out.

The reason this works is because once you have a decent income and want to start enjoying life you can’t do that in a 300-500sqft apartment.

This isn’t just shit I’m making up, there have been cities that have done this and it fucking works.

Even if we build cheap apartments for the homeless and fully fund it with tax payer money it actually saves tax payer money and gets the homeless out of the already over stressed healthcare system.

Most homeless are in and out of the hospital for easily preventable diagnosis that is a direct result of living on the street. This would free up a bed in the ED, free up a bed in acute care if admitted, and free up urgent care and other EMT resources.

This has been studied for YEARS. We know the answer to directly solving this without even trying to fix the other systemic issues at play here.

However, having a homeless population is good for capitalism. It’s an area where an employer can point to and say, “If you don’t work for pennies on the dollar, you’ll end up there.”

Technically more eligible registered voters did vote that didn’t, but it really doesn’t tell the whole story. 77 million voted for Trump. 75 million votes for Harris. Just under three million voted for a third party candidate of some kind. 90 million didn’t vote but were registered to vote.

We also don’t know the number of potentially eligible but not registered people there are.

The US has an estimated 340 million population. An estimated 260 million are adults.

It’s easy to see why people say ~30% of the country is deciding our fate.

All roads lead to Rome.

deleted by creator

“I’m not doing anything, that’ll show them.”

There’s a message, but by refusing to participate you are unable to enact change. It’s literally inaction. You’ve done nothing. In fact, they want you to do nothing. They do so much to pass voter suppression though loopholes and here you are, just handing it to them.

Congratulations, you suppressed yourself.

Didn’t a country do speeding tickets as a percent of income?

It hardly made a dent, though.

Link