• The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 day ago

      eventually they’ll runeout of ability to cram people into these concentration camps and they’ll have to figure out how to make room. they’ll give it some seemingly innocuous phrase, like “the alien question” as they seek some sort of solution. a final one.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      He can ask for them back, but El Salvador doesn’t have to listen. It’s like when you sell a car, once the title is signed over and you get the money the deal is done. You can always say “that was a mistake, can I have the car back” but the other party can just ignore you.

      And yes, it sickens me to be writing about humans like property you can just “transfer the title” for. But it must not have the same effect on Trump, Musk, or Rubio.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        He can ask for them back, but El Salvador doesn’t have to listen.

        They do if they know what’s good for them.

        But more to the point, alli the headlines, saying “can’t get them back” are misrepresenting the situation. Trump isn’t saying that he can’t get them back, he’s saying the judges can’t make him get them back.

        • SaltSong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          All the headlines, saying “can’t get them back” are misrepresenting the situation. Trump isn’t saying that he can’t get them back, he’s saying the judges can’t make him get them back.

        • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          The idea that Art of the Deal can’t get this guy back is absurd, they have the power and ability to do so. They refuse to.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s like when you sell a car, once the title is signed over and you get the money the deal is done.

        No, if you want a car to be your analogy, it’s more like a rental. The US is actively paying El Salvador to detain them. They can end that deal whenever they want.

      • huppakee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        You are right, but in this case the car they just received comes with upkeep costs and no particular benefits. If the US does the effort for getting them back, El Salvador has no real reason to keep them.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          “Not interested in dealing with trump’s fuckery” as well as “they handed us the political prisoners who fled our country” and possibly not wanting the political fallout from making deals with a fascist country.

          That said it would be amazing if El Salvador took the opportunity to show the world by treating these prisoners better than the US did

          • Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            “Miguel Sarre, a former member of the United Nations Subcommittee for the Prevention of Torture, described CECOT as a “concrete and steel pit” used to “dispose of people without formally applying the death penalty”, citing that the government does not intend to release the prison’s inmates.” –Article on CECOT by BBC Nobody that goes in comes out, there aren’t enough bunks or food for inmates, nobody is allowed to see or speak to the prisoners.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Except there are actually laws in place that let you do exactly that for a car purchase (in non-shithole places)

            • Ledivin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              You’re more than welcome to provide a link the law - as far as I can find, there is no mandatory cooling period for purchasing a car - or anything else you purchase in-person (many more exceptions for online) - unless there are issues. This appears to be true in both the EU as a whole and the US, though I haven’t looked into individual EU countries.

              Also, literally none of this applies to a sale between two private individuals. None of this would ever apply unless you buy from a retailer, which is not the scenario here as I understand it 🤷‍♂️

              • SlyLycan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                24 hours ago

                https://dcba.lacounty.gov/portfolio/california-car-buyers-bill-of-rights/

                I was merely showing buyers remorse laws exist for car purchases, though it looks like some of them aren’t in effect anymore at least in California (my last used car had a cooling off period).

                None of this would ever apply unless you buy from a retailer, which is not the scenario here as I understand it 🤷‍♂️

                And you can’t really compare it to “this scenario” because (most?) civilized countries don’t condone the buying and selling of people. You’re more than welcome to provide a link to legal retailers of humans though.

                as far as I can find, there is no mandatory cooling period for purchasing a car - or anything else you purchase in-person

                There are buyers remorse laws for other purchases as well, such as this

                • Ledivin@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  23 hours ago

                  You need to actually read the links you’re providing.

                  The buyer’s remorse one specifically refers to high-pressure sales such as door-to-door salesmen or a temporary business location (meeting a salesman in a hotel), or some subscriptions or delayed services. Nothing that would apply to buying a car without a really odd scenario.

                  And you can’t really compare it to “this scenario” because (most?) civilized countries don’t condone the buying and selling of people.

                  I was referring to the “sign the title over then regret it” scenario at the top of this thread.

  • BetaBlake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    These judges can arrest everyone else, if they don’t then they are feckless and complicit in democracy dieing

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Maybe the judge can’t stop Trump, but they can arrest every person on those flights. People will stop lining up when it means their freedom.

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, the judge can order the arrest of those people. We shall soon find out whether law enforcement will actual follow those orders…

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        IIRC the judge can order the arrests and also deputize people to carry them out.

      • ssroxnak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hopefully the judge does order their arrests. Aren’t those people technically following illegal orders anyway?

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Which isn’t defensible, so go after them. It worked in Nuremberg. The big thing is the charges need to come at a state level so they can’t be pardoned. Although, it’s still an inconvenience to make them get pardoned every time, so if the charges have to be federal, so be it.

    • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      And arrest every person above them letting this happen. All the way up through all levels of supervisors, managers, etc. They have control over their employees. Hell, even arrest the ATCs giving them flight access and the customs agents letting the crew back in. Everyone that is remotely tangential deserves to be tried and arrested.

  • CritFail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Nazi regime chose to build most of their concentration camps in nearby compliant/dominated countries as well.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      and each new camp they set up was more brutal and inhumane than any they’d built before. always built away from major population centers, but always close enough to an active front to quickly ship people to them