• eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        experts are trying to convince americans to respond, but we aren’t.

        • RustyShackleford@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          Like the French Revolution, it takes a lot for a revolt. Ultimately if faces aren’t seen, it forgotten. As for republicans, if they aren’t white faces; it’s forgotten in a day or two.

          • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Well you guys gotta make an effort or you’ll find out first hand the difference between e.g. Ukraine and Russia. Or Taiwan and China

            • tischbier@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Americans have to take on the largest military in the world. Are you selling war planes that you can get to Florida without issue?

              • aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                21 hours ago

                “americans” aren’t a regular army, they’re a dispersed civilian population and the us military historically actually has a lot of trouble with those

                • tischbier@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  Absolutely. So, your solution is normal Americans declare war and wage irregular asymmetric warfare today. Against what? Our local government buildings? The post office? Commit sabotage against what exactly?

                  • Triasha@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    We are going to find out if we prefer the consequences of revolt or the consequences of not revolting more.

      • jaxxed@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Tariffs have doubled the cost of red-lines, as they were sourced in S. E. Asia, processed in a small barely-know penguin island, and packaged in Denmark.

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The previous dismissals of court orders were injunctions, not rulings. That’s a contempt of court charge, not a constitutional crisis.

      Today were both the first and second rulings he has openly defied. The first was refusing to return Garcia. The second was refusing to allow the AP into the Oval Office to cover the press conference.

      • Back_it_up@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Right, so NOW we’ll see how things are, or are not, going to work. Next, the military is up. They would need to remove him from office and let new elections run. If not, then it’s up to us, the last line of defense.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      yeah its like a goalpost redline. Whelp its not really facism until he does x, oh well we are fine unless he gets away with y…

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, this is probably the first one.

      The previous one where they disobeyed a court order (turning around planes to El Salvador, stopping new planes from taking off) they successfully appealed that court order to where the Supreme Court declared that order void.

      This one (facilitate the return of a wrongfully deported man) is the first one where they’ve just outright refused, and are pretending they can’t comply.

      This is a big deal, and it’s unprecedented, even for Trump. This is the red line, and we’re going to see a full blown constitutional crisis this week if it doesn’t get resolved.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree in the sense that the way things played out the narrative can be he was right the whole time, so someone inclined to avoid conflict can excuse it, but even if you’re right, you’re still obligated to follow court orders until you successfully get it stayed or appealed. They got a lawful order from a court to turn around flights and just didn’t. The order doesn’t need to be at the end of an appeal to the Supreme Court before it has effect.

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          They got a lawful order from a court to turn around flights and just didn’t. The order doesn’t need to be at the end of an appeal to the Supreme Court before it has effect.

          I know. That was on a collision course for a constitutional crisis then, and then the Supreme Court bailed out Trump by saying the order was invalid, right before the judge was going to hold contempt hearings.

          Now we’re gonna see possible contempt hearings on disobeying an order that was affirmed by the Supreme Court.