How much better of a world? I’d be happy with half of what I have if it meant literally everyone else in the world could have that much, certainly. Move 4 more people into the house and give up half the money, half the clothes, my car, of course I would do that if it brought the same level of wealth to every single person, it would be not great at first but wow can you imagine how fast it would get better, if nobody was terribly poor? I’d bet that by the time I was old we’d personally be better off than before the split.

The trump family grifters and all their sycophantic (lookin’ at you Lindsay Graham) enablers

The landlords.

There are a lot of them so it would be exhausting work to behead them all myself but that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make

my chains. i’ve nothing else to lose.

Some billionaires

Burger King’s Chicken fries

This one.

A better world would imply that its better even when considering the sacrifice, meaning that any sacrifice would be worth it

If you’re not free, the world isn’t free.

A better world wouldn’t require sacrificing freedoms.

I’d sacrifice social media algorithms. Delete them all.

Private property isn’t a sacrifice. I don’t own any.

There’s a difference between personal property and private property. Private property is a mall, is a factory, is machinery at your workplace. Personal property is your toothbrush, your Playstation, your Television, your blender, your set of German knives, your computer, your books, etc.

Freedom of speech has never existed. The illusion of it has been allowed to be stronger or weaker in various places at various times, if your speech is no threat it’s often allowed, it’s when it’s a threat that suddenly the freedom vanishes and hides behind excuses like national security or illegal ideologies, etc.

I question how you would get rid of freedom of thought without some sort of hellish brain implants being made mandatory so it’s an odd thing to mention.

I’d be willing to sacrifice an awful lot of fascists, reactionaries, and an awful lot of enabling liberals. I’d be willing to sacrifice bourgeoisie. The expropriation of their private property is not a sacrifice but a necessity for things being held in common trust for the people.

It’s hard to imagine a world with no freedom of thought being better, somehow.

In practice, I doubt we’ll ever have to sacrifice much more than we already have. (Which is actually a significant amount. For example, until recent history living on a schedule was for ascetics and flagellants)

Private property for sure, as I don’t have any.

Freedom of speech too, as I don’t have any.

Billionaires, to the god Quetzalcoatl.