• some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh no! Hasn’t he been impeached twice already? Like, what other conclusion can society draw but “impeachment is entirely theatre”?

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      3 days ago

      Congress has an obligation to impeach presidents that break the law. Its like a cop should still arrest a criminal even if the mob boss can get them off and back on the street in hours.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Or what? What happens if congress doesn’t remove him? There is zero reason for the Republicans to go along with this since Trump is giving them everything they want

        • HubertManne@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          What do you mean or what? As I said its like the cop who arrests the criminal who skates but arrests him again if he catches him in a crime and again and again. He is obligated to. Congress is obligated to impeach presidents that break the law. Others can vote against it but he is breaking the law an impeachment was put into the constitution to handle the situation. Even if corruption elsewhere in the government can stop it from working.

          • BakerBagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s been shown to be absolutely meaningless since Nixon. And i bet he regrets resigning in whatever special hell was reserved for him. Every impeachment vote/proceeding has been am absolute joke. There is no actual mechanism to boot the president out of office if he refuses.

            Edit: sorry i completely dodged your original question. Congress has to begin an impeachment process or what? There is mo actual consequence for anyone who chooses not to

            • HubertManne@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              again it does not matter. they have an onus. just like the cop. impeachment was put in to use for problems like this and the onus is there regardless of if it works. They still need to do it. Similarly its an abuse of power to impeach when not warranted or on a technicality like clintons.

            • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              It was due to a concentrated effort at establishing FOX, et al as propaganda sources, that have enabled him to get away with such blatant criminality that Nixon couldn’t have dreamed of. Republicans set out specifically to prevent them having to do that ever again, knowing full well they’d be committing crimes in higher office in the future.

      • some_designer_dude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Clown?! How dare you!

        I’m not saying don’t do anything. I’m saying impeachment is theatre to appease people like you who apparently still believe it’s worth the time and effort of people who could otherwise be perusing actual solutions but won’t because, since it’s still not obvious, neither left nor right gives quite enough of a fuck about you to bother. Yet, anyway.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          What other solutions do these specific people have? Impeachment is the tool afforded them by their office for this problem. Sure, other people should be doing additional things, but what exactly does the impeachment process prevent these specific people from doing?

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        So this is going to remove him from power?

        It’s going to put him in prison?

        It’s going to stop or impede him in any capacity?

        We know what the answer to all of those are, so why waste time doing things that don’t help at all?

        I want the people who are supposed to fight back to fight back in ways that actually matter and effect the situation.

        Clown

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          We’re not allowed to talk about the things that would remove him from power, except very very obliquely.

        • Unpeeled7905@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          So this is going to remove him from power?

          It’s going to put him in prison?

          It’s going to stop or impede him in any capacity?

          Yes. An actual, honest to God, liberty loving impeachment would do this.

          No. His third impeachment will not accomplish this but you don’t not do it just because you think you know the outcome. You log all the cowards and traitors that reveal themselves in the failed vote for when it’s their turn.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            So when are we allowed to get mad at the only people in positions of power to oppose fascism doing theater in place of stopping fascism?

            • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              You’ve been allowed to be mad at Republicans for not upholding the rule of law in the first two impeachments since they failed to uphold the rule of law in the first two impeachments… That’s when

              • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Cool I’m mad at the Republicans.

                They need to be stopped.

                I’m mad that the only people in opposing positions of power, the Democrats, are doing theater instead of stopping the Republicans who NEED TO BE STOPPED.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              How do you recommend they personally stop fascism? Republicans control all three branches. Impeachment is their only legal avenue of recourse. Do you want them to do something outside their legal options? How exactly does getting arrested do anything but reduce their power to effect change?

              • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I think if democrats did things necessary to actually impede them people would want to support them instead of people starting to think they are complicit.

                If they get arrested it makes headlines and more people get engaged.

                If they grew a spine it would be a good thing.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  did things necessary to actually impede them

                  Like what though, specifically?

                  If they get arrested it makes headlines and more people get engaged.

                  Which probably isn’t worth sacrificing their vote and presence. Do they let Congress vote from prison?

                  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 days ago

                    Just yesterday goons were blocked from entering and fucking up the library of congress, those librarians have more balls than those rich politicians you are fellatiating

                    Fucking block them from entering the building and voting, form committees and get judges to deputize militas to arrest them. Anything that physically restricts them, because that’s all that has stopped them so far.

                    " Illegal things are illegal, guess we should keep doing nothing then while pretending it will do anything."

                    Jesus christ what a bootlicker mentality.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean it’s pretty much all they an do unless Americans want to exercise their 2nd Amendment right as it was intended.

    • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Someday the public will realise that impeachment isn’t the actual removal of someone from office, and in fact (AFAIK) there really isn’t a mechanism in place to do that other than shaming them till they quit of their own accord or imprisonment (and technically they could still perform their job from a cell)

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The House can impeach and the Senate takes that impeachment and decides if to remove from office. So there is a mechanism, but it doesn’t work so well when one major party is so far up the presidents ass they would never vote to remove

        We do need another failsafe mechanism, perhaps a way for the people to remove a president from office

        • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          “No confidence” voting would be great too, but at this point I’m not convinced it wouldn’t result in the same problem with the MAGA cult astroturfing the fuck out of every vote.