Just knowing a way to break his mind can be so simple is good to know.

  • dan00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It would be funny if we bully wikipedia to use this photo of him forever.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Tbh it seems like a very flattering depiction of him?

    Like, no jowls, no mouth-eyes.

    What’s his issue with it?

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I had money, I would buy this artwork and organize to have it displayed everywhere and covered massively by the media to piss him off.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      It should be the only reference image ever used in any news story about him, as should Drag Queen Putin for that shit bag.

  • Riskable@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    The correct response is to do as he asks… Respectfully remove the painting.

    Then replace it with a picture of an orange baby and put his name on the plaque.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The actual backstory on this (referenced in the article) is even more absurd.

      That spot which is supposed to have Trump’s picture was empty for quite a while because they were having trouble raising money for it. But then someone smuggled in a literal picture of Putin and hung it in its place. Colorado Republicans had no trouble raising the money after that.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean its bad, but it doesnt look intentionally mocking. Only piss babies would care. I wouldnt even care if someone drew me as the devil with a dick in each hand, hell yeah man art it up.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, it’s better than I could afford to pay someone to do a portrait of me.

      I could maybe afford a caricature artist, but not a real painter portrait artist.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seriously, its not like the picture of that wealthy Aussie cunt. Or of King Charles with the red everywhere.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Im fine if we remove all presidential portraits from both this term and the last. I would say I would like to wipe this whole period from the history books but we need the cautionary tale.