Federal judges are discussing a proposal that would shift the armed security personnel responsible for their safety away from the Department of Justice (DoJ) and under their own control, as fears mount that the Trump administration is failing to protect them from a rising tide of hostility.

Under the current system, federal judges are protected by the US marshals service, which is managed by the justice department. According to Wall Street Journal, those participating at the March conference expressed worries that Trump might instruct the marshals to withdraw security protection from a judge who ruled against him.

Amid those anxieties, the idea surfaced that federal judges should form their own armed security force. That would involve bringing the US marshals service under the direct control of the head of the judiciary, Chief Justice John Roberts.

  • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Firstly, they have one already, they have US Marshalls, who are responsible for enforcing the orders of the judiciary, though they are organizationally under the AG/DoJ.

    Secondly, I do not look forward to the 500k deputized (aka ask them if they have a gun) Texas super-Rangers they send to other states to enforce crazy ass Texas laws like life in prison for an abortion, if the man says you conceived in Texas, or just wants the kid.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      11 days ago

      though they are organizationally under the AG/DoJ.

      This is exactly the problem the judges are looking to solve.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      At present, marshals fall under the remit of Pam Bondi, the US attorney general. Bondi was appointed by the president and is a Trump loyalist.

      The article was pretty clear on why having the marshals/DoJ in charge would be a problem.

        • abrasiveteapot@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          11 days ago

          I’m saying the Marshalls are this body, they should be reassigned directly to the judiciary.

          Which involves asking the oppressing person/organisation to hand over the capability to resist them.

          “Please Mr Mugger, give me your gun, then you can’t rob me”

          How exactly do you think that request is going to go ?