For the second time in the less than four months, the US Senate has resoundingly voted in support of continuing the genocide in Gaza by rejecting two resolutions aimed at blocking some $9 billion in weapons to the Israeli government.

  • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    “Democrats are completely different than Republicans, they want to help people! Anyone saying otherwise supports Trump and is a useful idiot!”

    Adding this to the list of things Democrats and Republicans agree on, in 2025.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It is a coldly political calculation. The Dems are afraid that if they refuse to facililitate Israeli genocide, then American Jews won’t vote for them. At the same time, MAGA Nazis will step right up and pledge to kill every Muslim in the Middle East, and sweep up every vote.

      The Dems can’t afford to lose a fairly monolithic voting block.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Our government is full of geriatric fucks who are on the wrong side of history. Plus some younger ones on the wrong side. Basically none of them represent the will of the majority of young people. But it’s fine, whatever, fuck it.

  • nkat2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    In his speech, Sanders, an agent of US imperialism, observed that the US ruling class’ open support for war crimes in Gaza undercuts attempts by Washington to advance “human rights” arguments to justify US interventions and military actions around the world.

    Does anyone know why this site refers to Senator Sanders as an “agent of US imperialism”?

    This is very strange and makes it difficult to take this article seriously - which is a shame given the ongoing genocide.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    A correct headline: most of the Democrats and all of the Republicans supported the genocide.

    • Bacano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Even more correct: most of the US government supports genocide, and don’t care that their constituents don’t.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Isn’t it lovely that, in these times of polarization, division and conflict, all of Congress can come together and join hands in the common cause of genocidal slaughter of innocents.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    LOL. “but why do ppl not vote?”

    usa is no democracy. it has always been a wet dream for greedy pigs.

    throw them out. may the real native americans get their land back.

  • themaninblack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    WHY is it so fucking hard for them to take a hard line against genocide?? What the fuck. I feel like I’m going crazy watching this.

    • Rain@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I am old enough to remember 9/11. The only reason I can think of is that the US wants Muslims to die and they don’t care who does it.

    • WideEyedStupid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That’s exactly it. I just don’t get it. Seems like a no-brainer to me, but apparently I’m wrong.

      I guess it’s about money? Or they still think that being against genocide will lose them votes in the future? Or something.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        No, its profit. They’re making big bucks on the weapon sales.

        Over half of the US population is opposed to sending weapons to the Zionists.

    • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago
      These are the 15 Democrats that actually gave a shit about human rights and ending genocide:

      Bernie Sanders (Vt.),

      Richard Durbin (Ill.),

      Martin Heinrich (N.M.),

      Mazie Hirono (Hawaii),

      Ben Ray Luján (N.M.),

      Tim Kaine (Va.),

      Andy Kim (N.J.),

      Ed Markey (Mass.),

      Jeff Merkley (Ore.),

      Chris Murphy (Conn.),

      Brian Schatz (Hawaii),

      Tina Smith (Minn.),

      Chris Van Hollen (Md.),

      Elizabeth Warren (Mass.),

      Peter Welch (Vt.).

      Fuck every other Democrat and Republican Senator that voted to support genocide

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Good! We wouldn’t Want to ALIENATE the REPUBLICANS who will NEVER Vote for Us!

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      18 hours ago

      But alienating our base so that we can lose elections to MAGA republicans is perfectly OK.

      Obviously, the problem is with the voters, not us, say the Democrats.

  • terristbad@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    OH WAIT I THOUGH THINGS WERE GONNA GET BETTER WITH TURUMP KAMALA WOULD HAVE NEVER KEEP GENOCIDING. THE LEFTISS COST US THE ELECTION

    MY IQ IS 6

  • loaf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    So we either get Republican leaders who want everyone to suffer, or democratic leaders who only want others to suffer.

    I quit earth.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Democratic leaders might not want everyone to suffer, but frankly it doesn’t matter because their policies make everyone suffer anyway (among a host of other things, by giving legitimacy to fascists). The difference between Democrats and Republicans is one of degree, not kind.

      • TimmyDeanSausage @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Can you further explain how Democrat policies make everyone suffer and give legitimacy to fascists? I assume you’re talking about old style corpo dems?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I assume you’re talking about old style corpo dems?

          Yeah pretty much. Now to slightly correct myself, while their history of curtailing civil rights under the cover of counterterror is certainly fucked up what really makes everyone suffer isn’t what Democrats do; it’s what they don’t do. Democrats are neoliberals working under a mostly neoliberal status quo so frankly they don’t need to do anything except maintain that while occasionally giving the working class breadcrumbs to dissipate activist energy, and now you should ask yourself: What is the (pre-2025) status quo? Is that not one under which everyone suffers? Real wages (until Biden) keep falling, people can’t find homes to live, homelessness is at an all-time high, the climate crisis isn’t going anywhere, etc etc. Most of the time Democrats aren’t malevolent actors, but they’re seatwarmers who via their very existence and addiction to power (and donor money) prevent the working class from seizing political power and effecting real change. They also fight anything resembling such organization (see: Bernie 2016 and 2020, Jamaal Bowman). Democrats have coopted leftwing politics and turned them into capitalism that will fuck you slightly less, so rather than a tug of war between progress and reaction you have reaction pulling and “progress” condemning it in strongly worded letters. Biden breaking the railroad strike (you’ll see people saying that he gave them their demands later, but that’s untrue) was also pretty horrible.

          As for giving legitimacy to fascism you have surveillance laws, bombing brown people in the Middle East (both during Obama and Biden’s terms), going after anti-Zionist protesters, adopting the Republican stance on immigration (including Trump’s stupid border wall), never actually going after the fascists and of course touting bipartisanship and compromise with the fascists.

          Edit: These are both non-exhaustive lists, as I only follow the general beats of American politics. You’ll get far more exhaustive ones from American leftists.

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Hold on now, I think you’re misconstruing the position.

      It’s not that they want everyone to suffer, it’s that everyone deserves to suffer … unless chosen by birthright/god to inherit at least 10x what constitutes lifetime earnings for the Middle Class.

      You see, they were chosen to lead. Just like the kings of old. Why can’t the plebs see that?