• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 days ago

    Nah, I fucking wish because Captain Archer Doctor Beckett would actually try to do some good lol

    • drzoidberg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Wellllll akshually, he didn’t necessarily do good things every time. He did the things that were supposed to happen. Like that time he leaped in Lee Harvey Oswald, and had to kill Kennedy. Obviously not killing Kennedy would have been the good thing, but as it was supposed to happen, Sam killed Kennedy.

      The leaps we saw, were the good leaps. I’m sure there were a few that he had to be an abusive pimp to keep the timeline from collapsing or maybe commit a little war crime here and there in the name of history.

      • Uruanna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 days ago

        He doesn’t do things that are supposed to happen, though. He makes sure not to screw up History as he knows it, except he always comes across a little thing that went wrong in his timeline and had a ripple effect of bad consequences, and he fixes them by doing good and creating a good ripple effect. It’s never suggested that any of those things are “supposed to happen,” just that they did happen in his timeline, and he finds better ways to fix them, without fucking up everything else, and creating a better timeline that is not his original one. The very fact that he risks fucking up big things show that nothing is “supposed to happen.” The opening narration mentions he strives to “put right what once went wrong”, so it’s strongly suggested that, if anything, he’s “meant” to do good, which is his own conclusion as the show goes on, somebody set him on this path to do good.

        It’s never suggested that “putting right what once went wrong” means committing a crime that didn’t happen because without this crime, things were supposed to go worse. He fixes bad things by doing good. And, sure, we’re never shown that he needs to make sure a crime happens, but that goes against what’s suggested most of the time - imagine writing a show remotely hinting that maybe some war crimes that happened are justified or else it would have been worse. When he jumps into someone who’s about to do a bad thing, he just doesn’t do it and does good instead, the suggestion is that there’s no “'supposed to.”

        The Kennedy episode heavily suggested that he was being influenced by some kind of psychosis from Oswald and he was going crazy himself, unable to stop himself from shooting, and that tracks with other episodes where he was sometimes overwhelmed by traits from his host, rather than having to make sure the crime does happen. He tried to save both Kennedys, and he failed JFK, but he saved Jackie. It’s not suggested that JFK “had” to die, it’s suggested that he “failed” half of it because the host’s influence was too strong.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Your stance is supported by the show adding “evil” leapers in its later seasons. They were sent to specifically do evil acts, to create evil ripples.