Summary

The Atlantic has published unredacted attack plans (non-paywall link) shared in a Signal group chat of senior Trump officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

Editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg released the full texts after officials denied sharing war plans or classified information, arguing transparency was necessary amid accusations of dishonesty.

The leaked messages detailed U.S. military strikes targeting Houthis in Yemen.

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    201
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    So many people talking about the fact that this leaked, and not enough are talking about what leaked.

    We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

    If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process. But hey, they’re not Americans, so they don’t count.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        No one should be surprised. We’ve seen who these people are time and time again. But we shouldn’t be so desensitized to moral bankruptcy that we completely overlook such a disgusting disregard for human life.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          idk what to tell you anymore, i don’t care about human life lmao.

          You all ruined it for me by being so fucking stupid. Like i’m sorry, but how is a satirist supposed to live in a climate where everybody is just fucking stupid. The answer, inevitably, is benevolent disregard for human life, because clearly nobody cares about it enough to do anything about it.

    • Bouzou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s like the confirmation of Brett Kavenau when he threw a hissy fit about how he “likes beer”…

      That in and of itself should have disqualified him. If someone isn’t capable of being even-keeled and not throwing a temper tantrum, then they shouldn’t hold the highest judicial office in the land…

    • alkbch@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Since when do American leaders care about “collateral damage” ?

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

      As someone who was around for “We’ll put a boot in yer ass, it’s the American way” this does not surprise me in the slightest.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you have to kill someone, sure, that’s a moral position we can discuss. No one should ever be celebrating it, particularly when others died in the process

      I can think of a few deaths worth celebrating

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        There are only a few handful for whom I’d pull the trigger myself, but quite a multitude more that I would celebrate their passing with glee.

        • Glide@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I just think, especially when we’re pulling the trigger ourselves, we should be sad, maybe disappointed, that it’s come to that. Bad people are still people, and while I believe they throw away their right to life when they start indescriminately revoking it from others, I don’t ever want to find myself happy to take life. I’ll be happy later, in the better world that’s been created.

    • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      We’re talking about the same guys funded by the guy who says the ideal society is Mordor. This doesn’t surprise anyone. Everyone is expendable for the company’s machine, they wouldn’t mind targeting innocent people, let alone causing civilian casualties when targeting real terrorists.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      We have political leaders throwing up fire emoji’s over dropping a building on a terrorist, with no regard for the, what, dozens? of innocent lives that were lost in the crossfire.

      Correction: They dropped a building on a “terrorist” (read: brown person the US doesn’t like).

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        There is a reason to attack him. I don’t agree with the whole situation but shooting at cargo ships and American warships is going to get a response. I just expect the world’s most technological military to do a better job of not attacking innocent people in getting to him.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I don’t agree with the whole situation but shooting at cargo ships and American warships is going to get a response

          It’s going to get a response, but that response is as immoral as the status quo it’s trying to protect.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            It’s immoral on it’s face because of how they’re doing it is my point. There’s certainly a political philosophy discussion to be had about the underlying international system and American system, but there’s none to be had about throwing extra explosions around to “intimidate” a third country.

            • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              but there’s none to be had about throwing extra explosions around to “intimidate” a third country.

              There is, and not having that discussion does nothing but help the imperial core maintain their facade of moral legitimacy even as they murder innocent people all over the world.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      “If we discussed dropping a building on a terrorist we should also discuss bombing weddings, so let’s stick to using proper communication channels and following proper protocol for records”

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      These dumbfucks have no empathy. They will tell you empathy is weakness. In reality empathy is a social defense mechanism. If we all have empathy for each other it limits the harm we do. What they’re missing is not having it isn’t some kind of advantage, historically we are the most savage to those without empathy. It causes the mob to turn their empathy off and give in to their worst impulses. They think they’ll be the first ones in history to avoid that fate. They won’t.

      • zarathustrad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Look at what JD “couch fucker” Vance wrote. Regarding potentially delaying the strike. He didn’t give any shits about the benefits or risks to lives, only the optics (oil prices going up), politics and his hatred for helping Europe.

        Sure, clearing the shipping lanes is “good” but it’s more helpful to Europe “gross” so that’s a tick “con” colum.

        Their “worst case scenarios” were all “it could look bad”.